E 'no getting around: the passion for good food and good wine has a significant effect on the finances.
Not being rich, can afford to go more than once a week and, of course, let us know well to avoid being scam.
Until a few years ago, we rely on popular guide to search for restaurants to visit, but lately we orient ourselves on what customers like us or on word of mouth. The reasoning is simple: more and more often we happened to see marked with praise and bonuses expensive restaurants that did not deserve at all, while others, perhaps less well known but without doubt the most valuable, were not even considered.
Now, assuming that people who take care of these guides know their stuff (and God forbid), I begs the question: Why if I take a guide (you add the name because they resemble all) of 2010 and the comparison with that of 2007 can not find any difference? Because there are always the same premises with the occasional new entry? Why the reviews seem identical except for commas or any appropriate change of synonymous?
Probably these questions will remain idle for a secular sector, but obviously led me and many others to look for other ways to get reviews, perhaps less authoritative but still reliable.
The only thing really certain is that the reporting on the guide provides access to the golden road to fame and, subject to limited exceptions and commendable, the resulting increase in the price of the menu, turning the meal in a restaurant in a expensive passion for the privileged few chosen ones.
0 comments:
Post a Comment